Pathfinder 3.5L SL 4WD vs GS4 1.5T GB Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190 km/h
180 km/h
6
/
3490 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
8 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
/
5046 mm
4545 mm
1975 mm
1856 mm
1795 mm
1668 mm
2900 mm
2680 mm
470 L
470 L
180 mm
/
Fuel Economy
70 L
55 L
8 Km/L
14.7 Km/L
/
14.7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
McPherson Strut Coil Springs
/
Multi-Link Lateral Strut
/
Electric Power Steering (EPS)
/
Key Spec
3.5 L
1.5 L
254 BHP - 271 BHP
165 BHP
9AT & Automatic & CVT
TBD
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
7 - 8
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
3.5 L
1.5 L
Petrol
Gasoline
V6 9AT
/
None
/
4
/
271 BHP
165 BHP
271 @ 6,400
/
340 Nm
265 Nm
340 @ 4,800
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Pathfinder 3.5L SL 4WD
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Sensor Rear Tailgate
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
GS4 1.5T GB
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious interior space and flexible storage
- Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
- Comprehensive and advanced security equipment
Negative
- Medium fuel economy
- Traditional interior design needs updating
- Noticeable noise during high speeds
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Pathfinder 3.5L SL 4WD if you care more about interior space; choose GS4 1.5T GB if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Pathfinder 3.5L SL 4WD has a fuel consumption of No data, while GS4 1.5T GB has a fuel consumption of 6.8. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Pathfinder 3.5L SL 4WD has a wheelbase of 2900 mm , while GS4 1.5T GB has a wheelbase of 2680 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Pathfinder 3.5L SL 4WD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Pathfinder 3.5L SL 4WD uses Four Wheel Drive , while GS4 1.5T GB uses Front Wheel Drive.