Patrol 3.5 PRO 4X vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
200 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
8 Seater
5 Seater
2,783
/
20 INCH
/
5350
4760 mm
2030
1930 mm
1945
1927 mm
3075
2750 mm
244
224 m
/
5 Doors
/
400 L
Fuel Economy
/
10 Km/L
97
75 L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Smart Key
Keyless Entry
✓
/
Electric
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front, Rear And Third Row Seats
/
14.3
/
Front Row Seats
✓
✓
/
MONOLITH
/
✓
✓
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Genuine Quilted Leather
Leather
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
Front+ Side+ Curtain Airbags+ Driver Knee Bag
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
14.3
/
14.3
12.3
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
9
KLIPSCH
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
Transmission
✓
/
✓
/
9
/
9 SPEED AUTOMATIC
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
✓
/
Independent, Double Wishbone, Air Spring And Electric Shock Absorber
/
Independent, Double Wishbone, Air Spring And Electric Shock Absorber
/
/
Four Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
275/60 R22
/
275/60 R22
/
Key Spec
3.5 L - 425 HP (3.5L V6TT) / 316 HP (3.8L V6)
2.0 L
275 BHP - 495 BHP
223 BHP - 342 BHP
9 SPEED AUTOMATIC & 9-Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic
Automatic
Petrol & Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
7 - 8 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
3.5-LITER DOHC, V6, CVTCS, DIG TWIN TURBO ENGINE
/
425 BHP
224 BHP
700
387 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Patrol 3.5 PRO 4X
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Cool Box
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Sensor Rear Tailgate
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Speed Limiter
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
300 Challenger 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Outstanding off-road performance
- Outstanding engine power
- Spacious and luxurious interior design
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Slow electronic system response
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Patrol 3.5 PRO 4X if you care more about interior space; choose 300 Challenger 2.0T if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Patrol 3.5 PRO 4X has a fuel consumption of No data, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Patrol 3.5 PRO 4X has a wheelbase of 3075, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Patrol 3.5 PRO 4X, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Patrol 3.5 PRO 4X uses No data, while 300 Challenger 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive.