Nissan Patrol (Y63) vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
240 km/h
200 km/h
6
4
3492 cc
1998 cc
GCC
Chinese
Dimensions
8 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
5295 mm
4760 mm
2350 mm
1930 mm
1945 mm
1927 mm
3075 mm
2750 mm
550 L
400 L
195 mm
224 m
Fuel Economy
14.4 L/100km
10 Km/L
97 L
75 L
8 Km/L
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Keyless Entry
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Standard
✓
/
/
✓
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
9
Transmission
No
/
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Double-Wishbone
/
Torsion Beam with Coil Springs
/
Electric Power Steering (EPS)
/
Key Spec
3.5 L - 425 HP (3.5L V6TT) / 316 HP (3.8L V6)
2.0 L
275 BHP - 495 BHP
223 BHP - 342 BHP
9 SPEED AUTOMATIC & 9-Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic
Automatic
Petrol & Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
7 - 8 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
V
In-Line
425 HP (3.5L V6TT) / 316 HP (3.8L V6)
2.0 L
Petrol
Gasoline
V6
/
Twin Turbo
Single Turbo
4
4
495 BHP
224 BHP
700 Nm
387 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Nissan Patrol (Y63)
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Sensor Rear Tailgate
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
300 Challenger 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Outstanding off-road performance
- Outstanding engine power
- Spacious and luxurious interior design
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Slow electronic system response
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Nissan Patrol (Y63) if you care more about fuel economy; choose 300 Challenger 2.0T if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Nissan Patrol (Y63) has a fuel consumption of 6.94, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, Nissan Patrol (Y63) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Nissan Patrol (Y63) has a wheelbase of 3075 mm , while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Nissan Patrol (Y63), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Nissan Patrol (Y63) uses All Wheel Drive , while 300 Challenger 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive.