CarteaCompare CarsPatrol LE Titanium+ 3.5L vs ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

Patrol LE Titanium+ 3.5L vs ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

240 km/h

193 km/h

6

/

3492 cc

/

Japanese

/

Dimensions

8 Seater

5 Seater

5 Doors

/

5350 mm

4355 mm

2030 mm

1810 mm

1955 mm

1625 mm

3075 mm

2670 mm

836 L

358 L

253 m

/

Fuel Economy

97 L

63 L

7.5 Km/L

12.5 Km/L

/

12.5 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

Interior

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

14.3

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

12

/

Chassis & Steering

Four Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Key Spec

3.5 L - 425 HP (3.5L V6TT) / 316 HP (3.8L V6)

2.0 L - 2.0 L

275 BHP - 495 BHP

150 - 150

9 SPEED AUTOMATIC & 9-Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic

Automatic & CVT

Petrol & Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

7 - 8 Seater

5 - 5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Engine

V

/

3.5 L

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

Twin Turbo

/

4

/

425 BHP

150 BHP

700 Nm

197 Nm

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Patrol LE Titanium+ 3.5L

    • Power Tailgate
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Outstanding off-road performance
  • Outstanding engine power
  • Spacious and luxurious interior design

Negative

  • High fuel consumption
  • High purchase and maintenance costs
  • Slow electronic system response

Positive

  • Attractive and striking exterior design
  • Economical fuel consumption
  • Reliable and consistent performance

Negative

  • The space of the rear seats is limited
  • The infotainment system is outdated
  • Limited engine choices

Related comparisons

Editor's PickASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Patrol LE Titanium+ 3.5L if you care more about interior space; choose ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Nissan | Patrol LE Titanium+ 3.5L

VS

Toyota | Toyota Land Cruiser 2018 5.7L VXR

Nissan | Patrol LE Titanium+ 3.5L

VS

Tesla | Tesla Model X 2021 75D

Nissan | Patrol LE Titanium+ 3.5L

VS

Tesla | Tesla Model X 2020 75D

Nissan | Patrol LE Titanium+ 3.5L

VS

Tesla | Tesla Model X 2018 75D

Nissan | Patrol LE Titanium+ 3.5L

VS

Lincoln | Lincoln Navigator 2022 3.5T Reserve (AWD)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Patrol LE Titanium+ 3.5L has a fuel consumption of No data, while ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option has a fuel consumption of 8. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Patrol LE Titanium+ 3.5L has a wheelbase of 3075 mm , while ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option has a wheelbase of 2670 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Patrol LE Titanium+ 3.5L, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Patrol LE Titanium+ 3.5L uses Four Wheel Drive , while ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option uses Front Wheel Drive.