Patrol Safari Safari A/T Hard Top vs GS 8 2.0T GL (2WD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190 km/h
200 km/h
Dimensions
7 Seater
7 Seater
5080 mm
4980 mm
1940 mm
1950 mm
1855 mm
1780 mm
2970 mm
2920 mm
668 L
/
Fuel Economy
5.8 Km/L
13.3 Km/L
135 L
66 L
5.8 Km/L
13.3 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
4.8 L
2 L - 2 L
280 BHP
187 BHP - 332 BHP
Automatic & Manual
8-Speed Automatic & 8AT & AISIN 8AT & Automatic & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
7 Seater
7 Seater - 7 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
4.8 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
280 BHP
248 BHP
451 Nm
400 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
Patrol Safari Safari A/T Hard Top
- ABS
GS 8 2.0T GL (2WD)
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- Strong off-road performance
- Long-term reliability
- Internal capacity and flexible fittings
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Vintage interior design
- Modest technology compared to competitors
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickPatrol Safari Safari A/T Hard Top
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Patrol Safari Safari A/T Hard Top if you care more about price; choose GS 8 2.0T GL (2WD) if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Patrol Safari Safari A/T Hard Top has a fuel consumption of 17.24, while GS 8 2.0T GL (2WD) has a fuel consumption of 7.52. Therefore, GS 8 2.0T GL (2WD) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Patrol Safari Safari A/T Hard Top has a wheelbase of 2970 mm, while GS 8 2.0T GL (2WD) has a wheelbase of 2920 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Patrol Safari Safari A/T Hard Top, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Patrol Safari Safari A/T Hard Top uses All Wheel Drive, while GS 8 2.0T GL (2WD) uses Front Wheel Drive.