CarteaCompare CarsPatrol Safari Safari A/T Hard Top vs RX Flagship 2.0T

Patrol Safari Safari A/T Hard Top vs RX Flagship 2.0T Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

190 km/h

180 km/h

/

4

/

1998 cc

/

Chinese

Dimensions

7 Seater

5 Seater

5080 mm

4781 mm

1940 mm

1920 mm

1855 mm

1671 mm

2970 mm

2815 mm

668 L

500 L

/

5 Doors

/

187 m

Fuel Economy

5.8 Km/L

14 Km/L

135 L

55 L

5.8 Km/L

14 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

12.3

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

14

Transmission

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

4.8 L

2.0 L - 2.0 L

280 BHP

245 HP - 261 BHP

Automatic & Manual

7DCT & 8AT & Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

7 Seater

5 - 5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Engine

4.8 L

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

280 BHP

261 BHP

451 Nm

400 Nm

/

In-Line

/

Twin Turbo

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Patrol Safari Safari A/T Hard Top

    • ABS
  • RX Flagship 2.0T

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Strong off-road performance
  • Long-term reliability
  • Internal capacity and flexible fittings

Negative

  • High fuel consumption
  • Vintage interior design
  • Modest technology compared to competitors

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickPatrol Safari Safari A/T Hard Top

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Patrol Safari Safari A/T Hard Top if you care more about price; choose RX Flagship 2.0T if you care more about fuel economy.

Popular Car Comparisons

Nissan | Patrol Safari Safari A/T Hard Top

VS

Exeed | RX Flagship 2.0T

Nissan | Patrol Safari Safari A/T Hard Top

VS

GAC | GS 8 2.0T GL (2WD)

Nissan | Patrol Safari Safari A/T Hard Top

VS

GAC | GS8 2.0T GX (4WD)

Nissan | Patrol Safari Safari A/T Hard Top

VS

Toyota | Land Cruiser 70 VXR 4.0L (3 Door)

Nissan | Patrol Safari Safari A/T Hard Top

VS

Toyota | Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Patrol Safari Safari A/T Hard Top has a fuel consumption of 17.24, while RX Flagship 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 7.14. Therefore, RX Flagship 2.0T is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Patrol Safari Safari A/T Hard Top has a wheelbase of 2970 mm, while RX Flagship 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2815 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Patrol Safari Safari A/T Hard Top, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Patrol Safari Safari A/T Hard Top uses All Wheel Drive, while RX Flagship 2.0T uses All Wheel Drive.