Patrol Safari Safari A/T Hard Top vs Tiggo7 Pro Max COM Comparison
Car Information
SUV
/
Engine / Motor
190 km/h
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
5
5080 mm
4500
1940 mm
1842
1855 mm
1746
2970 mm
2670
668 L
/
/
Flush Door
/
18
/
5
Fuel Economy
5.8 Km/L
16.6
135 L
/
5.8 Km/L
/
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
Interior
/
Driver Seat
/
12.3
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
Infotainment
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
Automatic
7DCT
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Drive
Key Spec
4.8 L
/
280 BHP
/
Automatic & Manual
/
Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
7 Seater
/
Exterior
✓
/
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
4.8 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
280 BHP
197 BHP
451 Nm
290
/
1.6L TDGI
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Patrol Safari Safari A/T Hard Top
- ABS
Tiggo7 Pro Max COM
- 360 Degree Camera
- Push Button Start
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Steering Adjustment
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickTiggo7 Pro Max COM
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Patrol Safari Safari A/T Hard Top if you care more about interior space; choose Tiggo7 Pro Max COM if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Patrol Safari Safari A/T Hard Top has a fuel consumption of 17.24, while Tiggo7 Pro Max COM has a fuel consumption of 6.02. Therefore, Tiggo7 Pro Max COM is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Patrol Safari Safari A/T Hard Top has a wheelbase of 2970 mm, while Tiggo7 Pro Max COM has a wheelbase of 2670. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Patrol Safari Safari A/T Hard Top, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Patrol Safari Safari A/T Hard Top uses All Wheel Drive, while Tiggo7 Pro Max COM uses Front Drive.