Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top vs Mazda CX9 2019 2.5T Signature Edition (AWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190 km/h
210
/
4
Dimensions
7 Seater
7 Seater
5080 mm
5.075
1940 mm
1.969
1855 mm
1.716
2970 mm
2.930
668 L
407
/
✓
Fuel Economy
6 Km/L
11.8
135 L
74
6 Km/L
/
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Manual
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
4.8 L
2.5 L - 3.7 L
280 BHP
226 BHP - 273 BHP
Automatic & Manual
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7 Seater
7 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
4.8 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Petrol
280 BHP
230 BHP
451 Nm
420
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top
- ABS
Mazda CX9 2019 2.5T Signature Edition (AWD)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Rollover stability control
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Crash Auto Door Unlock
- Auto Door Lock
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- Strong off-road performance
- Long-term reliability
- Internal capacity and flexible fittings
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Vintage interior design
- Modest technology compared to competitors
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top if you care more about price; choose Mazda CX9 2019 2.5T Signature Edition (AWD) if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top has a fuel consumption of 16.67, while Mazda CX9 2019 2.5T Signature Edition (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 8.47. Therefore, Mazda CX9 2019 2.5T Signature Edition (AWD) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top has a wheelbase of 2970 mm, while Mazda CX9 2019 2.5T Signature Edition (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2.930. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top uses All Wheel Drive, while Mazda CX9 2019 2.5T Signature Edition (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.