PATROL XE vs Mazda CX-30 2024 2.0L Core 2WD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
192
/
4
Dimensions
8 Seater
5 Seater
18
/
5350
4395
2030
1795
1945
1562
3075
2655
244
/
/
430
Fuel Economy
/
16.7
97
48
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
Smart Key
/
Manual
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
12.3
/
✓
/
Monolith Display
/
Cloth
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Front+Side+Curtain+Driver Knee
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
✓
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
✓
/
✓
✓
9
/
9 SPEED AUTOMATIC
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
Electric Power Steering
/
/
✓
/
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
265/70 R18
/
265/70 R18
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
3.5 L - 425 HP (3.5L V6TT) / 316 HP (3.8L V6)
2.0 L - 2.0 L
275 BHP - 495 BHP
153 HP - 155 BHP
9 SPEED AUTOMATIC & 9-Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic
6 Sp SkyActiv with Sports Mode & Automatic
Petrol & Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7 - 8 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.8 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
3.8-LITER DOHC, V6, CVTCS DIG ENGINE
/
316 BHP
155 BHP
386
200
Technologies
✓
✓
ROCK, SAND, ECO, MUD, STANDARD, SPORT
/
Auto
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
PATROL XE
- Cool Box
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Speed Limiter
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
Mazda CX-30 2024 2.0L Core 2WD
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear AC Controls
- Electric Curtain - Rear
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Seats - Comfort
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Runflat Tyres
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Door Reflectors
- Electric anti-dazzling room mirror
- Tire Repair Kit
- Security System
- Pedestrian airbag
- First Aid Kit
- Fire Extinguisher
- Door Edge Protector
- Crosswind Assist
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Active Bonnet
- Acceleration Skid Control
- Collision Detection
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Speed Limiter
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- Outstanding off-road performance
- Outstanding engine power
- Spacious and luxurious interior design
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Slow electronic system response
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose PATROL XE if you care more about interior space; choose Mazda CX-30 2024 2.0L Core 2WD if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, PATROL XE has a fuel consumption of No data, while Mazda CX-30 2024 2.0L Core 2WD has a fuel consumption of 5.99. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, PATROL XE has a wheelbase of 3075, while Mazda CX-30 2024 2.0L Core 2WD has a wheelbase of 2655. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, PATROL XE, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. PATROL XE uses No data, while Mazda CX-30 2024 2.0L Core 2WD uses Front Wheel Drive.