PATROL XE vs Mazda CX-90 2024 3.3L High Plus Comparison

Car Information

/

6.2

Engine / Motor

/

210

/

6

Dimensions

8 Seater

7 Seater

18

/

5350

5100

2030

1994

1945

1756

3075

3010

244

/

/

566

Fuel Economy

/

9.1

97

/

Comfort

/

Smart Key

/

Manual

/

/

/

/

Interior

Front Row Seats

/

12.3

/

/

Monolith Display

/

Cloth

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

Front+Side+Curtain+Driver Knee

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

12.3

/

6

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

/

/

9

/

9 SPEED AUTOMATIC

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

/

Electric Power Steering

/

/

/

All Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

Disc

/

Disc

/

265/70 R18

/

265/70 R18

/

Key Spec

3.5 L - 425 HP (3.5L V6TT) / 316 HP (3.8L V6)

3.3 L - 3.3 L

275 BHP - 495 BHP

340 HP - 345 BHP

9 SPEED AUTOMATIC & 9-Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic

8 SPEED SKYACTIV WITH Mi-DRIVE & Automatic

Petrol & Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol

TBD

TBD

7 - 8 Seater

6 - 8

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

3.8 L

3.3 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

3.8-LITER DOHC, V6, CVTCS DIG ENGINE

/

316 BHP

345 BHP

386

500

Technologies

ROCK, SAND, ECO, MUD, STANDARD, SPORT

/

Auto

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • PATROL XE

    • Cool Box
    • Rear Camera
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Number of Airbags
    • Speed Limiter
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
  • Mazda CX-90 2024 3.3L High Plus

    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear AC Controls
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
    • Tire Repair Kit
    • Security System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Crosswind Assist
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Speed Limiter
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Outstanding off-road performance
  • Outstanding engine power
  • Spacious and luxurious interior design

Negative

  • High fuel consumption
  • High purchase and maintenance costs
  • Slow electronic system response

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickMazda CX-90 2024 3.3L High Plus

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose PATROL XE if you care more about interior space; choose Mazda CX-90 2024 3.3L High Plus if you care more about power.

Popular Car Comparisons

Nissan | PATROL XE

VS

Jeep | Jeep Grand Cherokee 2025 Limited+ 3.6L Plus

Nissan | PATROL XE

VS

Jeep | Jeep Grand Cherokee 2024 Limited 3.6L Plus

Nissan | PATROL XE

VS

Toyota | Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR

Nissan | PATROL XE

VS

Nissan | Nissan Patrol XE 3.8L

Nissan | PATROL XE

VS

Jeep | Jeep Wrangler 2023 3.6L V6 Rubicon X (2-Door)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, PATROL XE has a fuel consumption of No data, while Mazda CX-90 2024 3.3L High Plus has a fuel consumption of 10.99. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, PATROL XE has a wheelbase of 3075, while Mazda CX-90 2024 3.3L High Plus has a wheelbase of 3010. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, PATROL XE, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. PATROL XE uses No data, while Mazda CX-90 2024 3.3L High Plus uses All Wheel Drive.