Pegas 1.4L A/T vs Mazda 6 2024 2.5L V w/ Sunroof Comparison

Car Information

/

8.5

/

Engine / Motor

170 km/h

220

4

N/A

1368 cc

/

GCC

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

4 Doors

/

4300 mm

4.850

1700 mm

1.840

1460 mm

1.450

2570 mm

2.830

475 L

419

150 mm

/

/

Fuel Economy

/

12.2

43 L

62

13 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Keyless Entry

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

Digital

/

Single

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

8

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

6

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

Automatic

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Front Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Key Spec

1.4 L - 1.4 L

2.0 L - 2.5 L

93 BHP - 95

151 BHP - 231 BHP

3 Speed AT & Automatic & Automatic

6 Sp SkyActiv with Sports Mode & Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5

5 - 5

Exterior

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

/

1.4 L

2.5 L

Gasoline

Petrol

4

/

95 BHP

180 BHP

133 Nm

250

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Pegas 1.4L A/T

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • Mazda 6 2024 2.5L V w/ Sunroof

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Rear Defogger
    • Keyless Entry
    • Seats - Comfort
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Number of Airbags
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Economical in fuel consumption
  • Comfortable interior space in comparison with competitors
  • Good value for the price

Negative

  • Average performance on highways
  • The quality of the cabin materials is less competitive
  • Lack of advanced driving techniques

Positive

  • Stylish and modern exterior design
  • High internal manufacturing quality
  • Great driving and control fun

Negative

  • The back space may be tight
  • The suspension system can be harsh on off road
  • The interface of some technologies needs improvements

Related comparisons

Editor's PickPegas 1.4L A/T

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Pegas 1.4L A/T if you care more about price; choose Mazda 6 2024 2.5L V w/ Sunroof if you care more about power.

Popular Car Comparisons

Kia | Pegas 1.4L A/T

VS

Renault | Renault Megane 2020 2.0L PE

Kia | Pegas 1.4L A/T

VS

Peugeot | Peugeot 301 2018 1.6L Allure

Kia | Pegas 1.4L A/T

VS

Toyota | Toyota Yaris Sedan 2022 1.5L E (CVT)

Kia | Pegas 1.4L A/T

VS

Toyota | Toyota Yaris Sedan 2021 1.5L SE

Kia | Pegas 1.4L A/T

VS

Toyota | Toyota Yaris Sedan 2019 1.5L SE

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Pegas 1.4L A/T has a fuel consumption of No data, while Mazda 6 2024 2.5L V w/ Sunroof has a fuel consumption of 8.2. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Pegas 1.4L A/T has a wheelbase of 2570 mm, while Mazda 6 2024 2.5L V w/ Sunroof has a wheelbase of 2.830. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Pegas 1.4L A/T, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Pegas 1.4L A/T uses Front Drive, while Mazda 6 2024 2.5L V w/ Sunroof uses Front Wheel Drive.