Pegas 1.4L M/T vs Dodge Charger 2023 3.6L GT Comparison

Car Information

/

6.5

Engine / Motor

170 km/h

210

4

6

1368 cc

/

GCC

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

4 Doors

/

4300 mm

5040

1700 mm

1905

1460 mm

1479

2570 mm

3052

475 L

455

150 mm

/

Fuel Economy

13

9.3

43 L

70

13 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

Keyless Entry

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

Digital

/

Single

/

/

/

/

Manual

/

/

/

/

Driver Seat

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

8

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

6

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

Manual

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Front Drive

Rear Wheel Drive

Key Spec

1.4 L - 1.4 L

3.6 L - 6.4 L

93 BHP - 95

292 BHP - 707 BHP

3 Speed AT & Automatic & Automatic & Manual

Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 - 5

5 Seater

Exterior

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

/

1.4 L

3.6 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

4

/

95 BHP

300 BHP

133 Nm

358

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Pegas 1.4L M/T

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • Dodge Charger 2023 3.6L GT

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Push Button Start
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Knee Bag - Driver
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Economical in fuel consumption
  • Comfortable interior space in comparison with competitors
  • Good value for the price

Negative

  • Average performance on highways
  • The quality of the cabin materials is less competitive
  • Lack of advanced driving techniques

Positive

  • Amazing power and acceleration
  • Unique American muscular design
  • Pleasant driving experience and excellent control

Negative

  • High fuel consumption
  • The quality of interior materials is average
  • Suspension comfort is not ideal

Related comparisons

Editor's PickPegas 1.4L M/T

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Pegas 1.4L M/T if you care more about price; choose Dodge Charger 2023 3.6L GT if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Kia | Pegas 1.4L M/T

VS

Hongqi | Hongqi H5 Flagship

Kia | Pegas 1.4L M/T

VS

Honda | Ciciv SPORT

Kia | Pegas 1.4L M/T

VS

Mazda | Mazda 6 2024 2.5L V w/ Sunroof

Kia | Pegas 1.4L M/T

VS

MG | MG7 1.5T DEL

Kia | Pegas 1.4L M/T

VS

Alfa Romeo | Alfa Romeo Giulietta 2021 Super

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Pegas 1.4L M/T has a fuel consumption of 7.69, while Dodge Charger 2023 3.6L GT has a fuel consumption of 10.75. Therefore, Pegas 1.4L M/T is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Pegas 1.4L M/T has a wheelbase of 2570 mm, while Dodge Charger 2023 3.6L GT has a wheelbase of 3052. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Dodge Charger 2023 3.6L GT, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Pegas 1.4L M/T uses Front Drive, while Dodge Charger 2023 3.6L GT uses Rear Wheel Drive.