Pegas 1.4L M/T vs Mazda 6 2024 2.5L V w/ Sunroof Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170 km/h
220
4
N/A
1368 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
/
4300 mm
4.850
1700 mm
1.840
1460 mm
1.450
2570 mm
2.830
475 L
419
150 mm
/
/
✓
Fuel Economy
13
12.2
43 L
62
13 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Digital
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Manual
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.4 L - 1.4 L
2.0 L - 2.5 L
93 BHP - 95
151 BHP - 231 BHP
3 Speed AT & Automatic & Automatic
6 Sp SkyActiv with Sports Mode & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.4 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Petrol
4
/
95 BHP
180 BHP
133 Nm
250
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Pegas 1.4L M/T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Mazda 6 2024 2.5L V w/ Sunroof
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Rear Defogger
- Keyless Entry
- Seats - Comfort
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
Review Comparison
Positive
- Economical in fuel consumption
- Comfortable interior space in comparison with competitors
- Good value for the price
Negative
- Average performance on highways
- The quality of the cabin materials is less competitive
- Lack of advanced driving techniques
Positive
- Stylish and modern exterior design
- High internal manufacturing quality
- Great driving and control fun
Negative
- The back space may be tight
- The suspension system can be harsh on off road
- The interface of some technologies needs improvements
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Pegas 1.4L M/T if you care more about price; choose Mazda 6 2024 2.5L V w/ Sunroof if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Pegas 1.4L M/T has a fuel consumption of 7.69, while Mazda 6 2024 2.5L V w/ Sunroof has a fuel consumption of 8.2. Therefore, Pegas 1.4L M/T is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Pegas 1.4L M/T has a wheelbase of 2570 mm, while Mazda 6 2024 2.5L V w/ Sunroof has a wheelbase of 2.830. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Pegas 1.4L M/T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Pegas 1.4L M/T uses Front Drive, while Mazda 6 2024 2.5L V w/ Sunroof uses Front Wheel Drive.