Performance AWD vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180
161 km/h
1.5T
/
UAE
/
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
22 inch
/
4825
4341 mm
1980
1804 mm
1610
1693 mm
2940
2676 mm
500-1325L
414 L
190
/
Fuel Economy
/
17.2 Km/L
/
50 L
/
17.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
Interior
35.4
/
✓
/
Front and Back Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Nappa leather, antibacterial material
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
2 front, 2 front-side and 2 front/rear integrated curtain airbags
/
✓
/
ESP
/
ESP
/
Rear electronic child safety lock
/
/
✓
Infotainment
15.6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
25
/
Meridian premium audio, 25 speakers, 7.1.4 surround sound
/
Battery/Charging
30%-80%: approximately 10 min
/
120
/
30%-80%: approximately 10 min
/
Transmission
AT
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Double wishbone
/
Multi-link
/
Wheels/brakes
265/40 R22
/
265/40 R22
/
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1.5 L
1.6 L - 2.0 L
310 - 590
105 BHP - 135 BHP
AT & Single-speed Fixed-Ratio Automatic & Single-speed Fixed-Ratio Automatic.
Automatic & CVT & Manual
Electric & Hybrid
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
1.5
1.6 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
Turbocharge
/
500
115 BHP
110
/
/
156 Nm
Motor
262
/
2
/
8 years, unlimited mileage (T&C apply)
/
30%-80%: approximately 10 min (DC fast charging)
/
LFP battery
/
Dual drive motors, front and rear
/
369
/
188
/
Front and rear
/
Technologies
1 millimeter-wave radar; 12 ultrasonic radars
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Performance AWD
- 360 Degree Camera
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Blind Spot Warning
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Lock
Duster 1.6L PE (4x2)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Performance AWD if you care more about interior space; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Performance AWD has a fuel consumption of No data, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Performance AWD has a wheelbase of 2940, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Performance AWD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Performance AWD uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) uses Front Wheel Drive.