Peugeot 301 2015 Access vs Mazda 3 Sedan 2.0L Evolve Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
188
/
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4442
/
1748
/
1477
/
2655
/
640
/
Fuel Economy
15.4
18.2
50
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Key Spec
1.6 L
2.0 L - 2.0 L
115 BHP
153 BHP - 153 BHP
Automatic & CVT
6 SPEED SKYACTIV WITH SPORTS MODE & Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 - 5
Engine
1.6 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
115 BHP
153 BHP
150
/
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Peugeot 301 2015 Access
- Keyless Entry
- Steering Adjustment
- ABS
Mazda 3 Sedan 2.0L Evolve
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickPeugeot 301 2015 Access
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Peugeot 301 2015 Access if you care more about price; choose Mazda 3 Sedan 2.0L Evolve if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Peugeot 301 2015 Access has a fuel consumption of 6.49, while Mazda 3 Sedan 2.0L Evolve has a fuel consumption of 5.49. Therefore, Mazda 3 Sedan 2.0L Evolve is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Peugeot 301 2015 Access has a wheelbase of 2655, while Mazda 3 Sedan 2.0L Evolve has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Peugeot 301 2015 Access uses Front Wheel Drive, while Mazda 3 Sedan 2.0L Evolve uses No data.