Peugeot 301 2024 Peugeot 301 2024 1.6L Active vs A6 e-tron Standard Comparison
Car Information
12.1
/
✓
/
Engine / Motor
188
/
N/A
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
/
✓
/
4.445
/
1.748
/
1.466
/
2.652
/
506
/
Fuel Economy
15.2
/
50
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
/
Key Spec
1.6 L
/
115 BHP
TBD
Automatic & CVT
TBD
Gasoline
Electric
TBD
/
5 Seater
TBD
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
1.6 L
/
Petrol
Electric
115 BHP
/
150
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Peugeot 301 2024 Peugeot 301 2024 1.6L Active
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Keyless Entry
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Auto Door Lock
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
A6 e-tron Standard
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickA6 e-tron Standard
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Peugeot 301 2024 Peugeot 301 2024 1.6L Active if you care more about overall equipment; choose A6 e-tron Standard if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Peugeot 301 2024 Peugeot 301 2024 1.6L Active has a fuel consumption of 6.58, while A6 e-tron Standard has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Peugeot 301 2024 Peugeot 301 2024 1.6L Active has a wheelbase of 2.652, while A6 e-tron Standard has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Peugeot 301 2024 Peugeot 301 2024 1.6L Active uses Front Wheel Drive, while A6 e-tron Standard uses No data.