Peugeot RCZ 2016 Sport vs Nissan GT-R 2023 Track Edition Comparison
Car Information
/
2.8
Engine / Motor
213
350
4
6
Dimensions
4 Seater
4 Seater
4287
4690
1845
1895
1359
1370
2612
2780
384
249
Fuel Economy
13.7
8.5
55
72
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
/
✓
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
/
✓
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
Key Spec
1.6 L
3.8 L
156 BHP - 200 BHP
485 BHP - 600 BHP
Automatic & Manual
Automatic & Manual
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
2 Seater - 4 Seater
2 Seater - 4 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.6 L
3.8 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
163 BHP
600 BHP
240
652
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Peugeot RCZ 2016 Sport
- Keyless Entry
- Steering Adjustment
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
Nissan GT-R 2023 Track Edition
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Seats - Comfort
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Rollover stability control
- Runflat Tyres
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- First Aid Kit
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Acceleration Skid Control
- Crash Auto Door Unlock
- Auto Door Lock
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful engine performance, suitable for high acceleration
- Excellent control and stability when driving fast
- Bold and attractive exterior design
Negative
- Purchase and maintenance costs are high
- Relatively poor fuel economy
- Ride comfort is limited by suspension stiffness
Related comparisons
Editor's PickNissan GT-R 2023 Track Edition
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Peugeot RCZ 2016 Sport if you care more about fuel economy; choose Nissan GT-R 2023 Track Edition if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Peugeot RCZ 2016 Sport has a fuel consumption of 7.3, while Nissan GT-R 2023 Track Edition has a fuel consumption of 11.76. Therefore, Peugeot RCZ 2016 Sport is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Peugeot RCZ 2016 Sport has a wheelbase of 2612, while Nissan GT-R 2023 Track Edition has a wheelbase of 2780. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Nissan GT-R 2023 Track Edition, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Peugeot RCZ 2016 Sport uses Front Wheel Drive, while Nissan GT-R 2023 Track Edition uses All Wheel Drive.