Phantom 6.75L Extended Wheelbase vs IS 300 Premier 2.0L Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
260 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
4 Seater
5 Seater
6092 mm
4665 mm
1990 mm
1810 mm
1640 mm
1430 mm
3820 mm
2800 mm
460 L
480 L
/
4 Doors
/
140 m
Fuel Economy
7.2 Km/L
13 Km/L
100 L
66 L
7.2 Km/L
13 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Key Spec
6.7 L - 6.8 L
2.0 L - 3.5 L
453 BHP - 571 BHP
241 BHP - 312 BHP
Automatic
8 Speed Sport Direct Shift
Gasoline & Petrol
Petrol & Gasoline
TBD
TBD
4 Seater
5 Seater - 5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
Engine
6.7 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
563 BHP
241 BHP
900 Nm
350 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Phantom 6.75L Extended Wheelbase
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
IS 300 Premier 2.0L
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickIS 300 Premier 2.0L
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Phantom 6.75L Extended Wheelbase if you care more about interior space; choose IS 300 Premier 2.0L if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Phantom 6.75L Extended Wheelbase has a fuel consumption of 13.89, while IS 300 Premier 2.0L has a fuel consumption of 7.69. Therefore, IS 300 Premier 2.0L is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Phantom 6.75L Extended Wheelbase has a wheelbase of 3820 mm, while IS 300 Premier 2.0L has a wheelbase of 2800 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Phantom 6.75L Extended Wheelbase, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Phantom 6.75L Extended Wheelbase uses Rear Wheel Drive, while IS 300 Premier 2.0L uses Rear Wheel Drive.