CarteaCompare CarsPilot EX-L 3.5L vs Frontlander Comfort

Pilot EX-L 3.5L vs Frontlander Comfort Comparison

Car Information

Gasoline

/

Honda

/

212.5

/

355

/

5089x1994x1826

/

8.7

/

3.5

/

Engine / Motor

6

/

3471cc

/

Dimensions

8

/

1534

/

18 英寸

/

5089

/

1994

/

1826

/

2890

/

210

/

Fuel Economy

70

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

9

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

9

/

Transmission

10

/

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

Four-Wheel Drive

/

Wheels/brakes

/

/

265/60 R18

/

265/60 R18

/

/

Key Spec

3.5 L - 3.5 L

TBD

253 BHP - 285

TBD

Automatic

TBD

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

TBD

7 Seater - 8

TBD

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

V

/

3.5

/

Gasoline

/

Naturally Aspirated

/

3.5L V6 Quad Cam

/

4

/

11.5:1

/

DUAL VTC+Quad Cam

/

285

/

212.5

/

6100

/

355

/

5000

/

VCM 可变气缸管理

/

高压直喷

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Pilot EX-L 3.5L

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Electric Locks
    • Seats - Comfort
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Lane Following Assist
    • Driving Recorder
    • Rollover stability control
    • Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
    • Security System
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Active Safety Warning System
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
  • Frontlander Comfort

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • Spacious and comfortable interior
    • Strong performance and acceptable fuel economy
    • Advanced and reliable security features

    Negative

    • The price is higher than some competitors
    • The infotainment system may be complicated
    • Limited engine options

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickFrontlander Comfort

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose Pilot EX-L 3.5L if you care more about overall equipment; choose Frontlander Comfort if you care more about price.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Honda | Pilot EX-L 3.5L

    VS

    Ford | Bronco 2.7T Outer Banks

    Honda | Pilot EX-L 3.5L

    VS

    Toyota | Land Cruiser 4.0L GXR

    Honda | Pilot EX-L 3.5L

    VS

    Jeep | Jeep Grand Cherokee 2019 SRT8

    Honda | Pilot EX-L 3.5L

    VS

    Mercedes Benz | GLB 250 4MATIC

    Honda | Pilot EX-L 3.5L

    VS

    Chevrolet | Chevrolet Suburban 2019 5.3L Premium 4WD

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, Pilot EX-L 3.5L has a fuel consumption of 8.7, while Frontlander Comfort has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, Pilot EX-L 3.5L has a wheelbase of 2890, while Frontlander Comfort has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Pilot EX-L 3.5L uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Frontlander Comfort uses No data.