Pilot EX-L 3.5L vs RX Comfort 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
6
4
3471cc
1998 cc
/
185 km/h
/
Chinese
Dimensions
8
5 Seater
1534
/
18 英寸
/
5089
4781 mm
1994
1920 mm
1826
1671 mm
2890
2815 mm
210
187 m
/
5 Doors
/
500 L
Fuel Economy
70
50 L
/
16 Km/L
/
16 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
✓
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
9
12.3
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Android LCD
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
9
8
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
10
/
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
265/60 R18
/
265/60 R18
/
✓
/
Key Spec
3.5 L - 3.5 L
2.0 L - 2.0 L
253 BHP - 285
245 HP - 261 BHP
Automatic
7DCT & 8AT & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
7 Seater - 8
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
V
In-Line
3.5
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Naturally Aspirated
/
3.5L V6 Quad Cam
/
4
4
11.5:1
/
DUAL VTC+Quad Cam
/
285
261 BHP
212.5
/
6100
/
355
400 Nm
5000
/
VCM 可变气缸管理
/
高压直喷
/
/
Twin Turbo
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Pilot EX-L 3.5L
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Electric Locks
- Seats - Comfort
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Lane Following Assist
- Driving Recorder
- Rollover stability control
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Security System
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Active Safety Warning System
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
RX Comfort 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Strong performance and acceptable fuel economy
- Advanced and reliable security features
Negative
- The price is higher than some competitors
- The infotainment system may be complicated
- Limited engine options
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Pilot EX-L 3.5L if you care more about interior space; choose RX Comfort 2.0T if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Pilot EX-L 3.5L has a fuel consumption of 8.7, while RX Comfort 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 6.25. Therefore, RX Comfort 2.0T is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Pilot EX-L 3.5L has a wheelbase of 2890, while RX Comfort 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2815 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Pilot EX-L 3.5L, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Pilot EX-L 3.5L uses Four-Wheel Drive, while RX Comfort 2.0T uses Front Wheel Drive.