Poer Pickup Double Cab High vs Ranger XL 2.0T (LOW) Comparison
Car Information
5410x1934x1886
/
Engine / Motor
/
180 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
18"
/
5410
5370 mm
1934
1918 mm
1886
1884 mm
3230
3270 mm
/
4 Doors
/
1200 L
/
230 m
Fuel Economy
11.8
8 Km/L
80
80 L
/
8 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
Leather
Fabric
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
Digital
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
2
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
4
6
/
10
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
Transmission
✓
/
✓
/
8AT
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
4WD
/
Wheels/brakes
265/60 R18
/
265/60 R18
/
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
2.0 L - 3.2 L
160 BHP - 188
118 BHP - 392 BHP
8AT & AT8 & Automatic & Manual
10AT & 6MT & AT & Automatic & Manual
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
3 Seater - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Halogen
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Diesel
188 HP
168 BHP
5500
/
360
405 Nm
3600
/
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Poer Pickup Double Cab High
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Ranger XL 2.0T (LOW)
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Poer Pickup Double Cab High if you care more about fuel economy; choose Ranger XL 2.0T (LOW) if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Poer Pickup Double Cab High has a fuel consumption of 8.47, while Ranger XL 2.0T (LOW) has a fuel consumption of 12.5. Therefore, Poer Pickup Double Cab High is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Poer Pickup Double Cab High has a wheelbase of 3230, while Ranger XL 2.0T (LOW) has a wheelbase of 3270 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Ranger XL 2.0T (LOW), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Poer Pickup Double Cab High uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Ranger XL 2.0T (LOW) uses Four Wheel Drive.