CarteaCompare CarsPolestar 3 2024 Long Range (Dual Motor) vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR

Polestar 3 2024 Long Range (Dual Motor) vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR Comparison

Car Information

5.0

/

Engine / Motor

210

210 km/h

N/A, Electric

6

/

3490 cc

/

GCC

Dimensions

5 Seater

7 Seater

4900

5115 mm

1968

1980 mm

1614

1920 mm

2985

2890 mm

/

5 Doors

/

1004 L

/

221 m

Fuel Economy

/

9.4 Km/L

/

110 L

/

9.4 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

Fabric

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

Standard

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

9

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

6

Transmission

/

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Four Wheel Drive

Key Spec

TBD

/

489 BHP - 517 BHP

240 BHP - 409

TBD

10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode & Automatic & Manual

Electric

Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

/

5 Seater

7 - 8 Seater

/

3.3 L - 5.7 L

/

TBD

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Engine

0.0 L

4.0 L

Electric

Gasoline

489 BHP

271 BHP

840

385 Nm

/

V

/

Twin Turbo

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Polestar 3 2024 Long Range (Dual Motor)

    • 360 Degree camera
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Collision Detection
  • Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Sensor Rear Tailgate
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Powerful off-road capabilities
  • Exceptional reliability and durability
  • Interior comfort and luxury equipment

Negative

  • High fuel consumption
  • High purchase and maintenance costs
  • Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight

Related comparisons

Editor's PickLand Cruiser 4.0L EXR

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Polestar 3 2024 Long Range (Dual Motor) if you care more about interior space; choose Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Polestar | Polestar 3 2024 Long Range (Dual Motor)

VS

Polestar | Polestar 3 2024 Long Range (Dual Motor)

Polestar | Polestar 3 2024 Long Range (Dual Motor)

VS

Nio | EL8 Standard Range

Polestar | Polestar 3 2024 Long Range (Dual Motor)

VS

Hongqi | EHS9 Executive

Polestar | Polestar 3 2024 Long Range (Dual Motor)

VS

Hongqi | EHS9 Executive

Polestar | Polestar 3 2024 Long Range (Dual Motor)

VS

Jaguar | Jaguar I Pace 2022 EV400 SE (AWD)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Polestar 3 2024 Long Range (Dual Motor) has a fuel consumption of No data, while Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR has a fuel consumption of 10.64. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Polestar 3 2024 Long Range (Dual Motor) has a wheelbase of 2985, while Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR has a wheelbase of 2890 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Polestar 3 2024 Long Range (Dual Motor), offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Polestar 3 2024 Long Range (Dual Motor) uses All Wheel Drive, while Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR uses Four Wheel Drive.