Polestar 3 2024 Long Range (Dual Motor) vs RX 350h Platinum 2.5L Comparison

Car Information

5.0

/

Engine / Motor

210

260 km/h

N/A, Electric

4

/

2490 cc

/

GCC

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

4900

4890 mm

1968

1920 mm

1614

1695 mm

2985

2850 mm

/

5 Doors

/

350 L

/

160 m

Fuel Economy

/

15 Km/L

/

65 L

/

15 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

14

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

21

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Key Spec

TBD

/

489 BHP - 517 BHP

246 BHP - 366 BHP

TBD

6 Speed Automatic Transmission & 8 Speed Automatic Transmission & AT & Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT)

Electric

Hybrid & Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid

TBD

/

5 Seater

5 Seater - 5 Seater

/

3.5 L - 3.5 L

/

TBD

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Engine

0.0 L

2.5

Electric

Hybrid

489 BHP

246 BHP

840

315 Nm

/

In-Line

/

None

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Polestar 3 2024 Long Range (Dual Motor)

    • 360 Degree camera
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Collision Detection
  • RX 350h Platinum 2.5L

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Luxury design and high quality
  • Good fuel efficiency
  • Advanced technology and amenities

Negative

  • The price is high for some competitors
  • Limited back-end storage space
  • Less sharp control compared to some sports cars

Related comparisons

Editor's PickRX 350h Platinum 2.5L

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Polestar 3 2024 Long Range (Dual Motor) if you care more about interior space; choose RX 350h Platinum 2.5L if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Polestar | Polestar 3 2024 Long Range (Dual Motor)

VS

Polestar | Polestar 3 2024 Long Range (Dual Motor)

Polestar | Polestar 3 2024 Long Range (Dual Motor)

VS

Nio | EL8 Standard Range

Polestar | Polestar 3 2024 Long Range (Dual Motor)

VS

Hongqi | EHS9 Executive

Polestar | Polestar 3 2024 Long Range (Dual Motor)

VS

Hongqi | EHS9 Executive

Polestar | Polestar 3 2024 Long Range (Dual Motor)

VS

Jaguar | Jaguar I Pace 2022 EV400 SE (AWD)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Polestar 3 2024 Long Range (Dual Motor) has a fuel consumption of No data, while RX 350h Platinum 2.5L has a fuel consumption of 6.67. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Polestar 3 2024 Long Range (Dual Motor) has a wheelbase of 2985, while RX 350h Platinum 2.5L has a wheelbase of 2850 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Polestar 3 2024 Long Range (Dual Motor), offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Polestar 3 2024 Long Range (Dual Motor) uses All Wheel Drive, while RX 350h Platinum 2.5L uses Front Wheel Drive.