Polestar 3 2024 Long Range (Dual Motor) PRFM vs RX 350h Platinum 2.5L Comparison

Car Information

4.7

/

Engine / Motor

210

260 km/h

N/A, Electric

4

/

2490 cc

/

GCC

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

4.900

4890 mm

1.968

1920 mm

1.614

1695 mm

2.985

2850 mm

484

350 L

/

5 Doors

/

160 m

Fuel Economy

/

15 Km/L

/

65 L

/

15 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

560

/

/

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

14

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

21

Chassis & Steering

/

/

All Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Key Spec

TBD

/

489 BHP - 517 BHP

246 BHP - 366 BHP

TBD

6 Speed Automatic Transmission & 8 Speed Automatic Transmission & AT & Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT)

Electric

Hybrid & Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid

TBD

/

5 Seater

5 Seater - 5 Seater

/

3.5 L - 3.5 L

/

TBD

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Engine

0.0 L

2.5

Electric

Hybrid

517 BHP

246 BHP

910

315 Nm

/

In-Line

/

None

/

4

Motor

Double

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Polestar 3 2024 Long Range (Dual Motor) PRFM

    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Collision Detection
    • Auto Door Lock
  • RX 350h Platinum 2.5L

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Luxury design and high quality
  • Good fuel efficiency
  • Advanced technology and amenities

Negative

  • The price is high for some competitors
  • Limited back-end storage space
  • Less sharp control compared to some sports cars

Related comparisons

Editor's PickRX 350h Platinum 2.5L

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Polestar 3 2024 Long Range (Dual Motor) PRFM if you care more about power; choose RX 350h Platinum 2.5L if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Polestar | Polestar 3 2024 Long Range (Dual Motor) PRFM

VS

Polestar | Polestar 3 2024 Long Range (Dual Motor) PRFM

Polestar | Polestar 3 2024 Long Range (Dual Motor) PRFM

VS

BMW | BMW X6 2022 xDrive40i

Polestar | Polestar 3 2024 Long Range (Dual Motor) PRFM

VS

BMW | BMW X6 2021 xDrive40i

Polestar | Polestar 3 2024 Long Range (Dual Motor) PRFM

VS

Maserati | Maserati Levante 2020 3.0T V6 GranLusso

Polestar | Polestar 3 2024 Long Range (Dual Motor) PRFM

VS

Maserati | Maserati Levante 2019 3.0T V6 GranLusso

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Polestar 3 2024 Long Range (Dual Motor) PRFM has a fuel consumption of No data, while RX 350h Platinum 2.5L has a fuel consumption of 6.67. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Polestar 3 2024 Long Range (Dual Motor) PRFM has a wheelbase of 2.985, while RX 350h Platinum 2.5L has a wheelbase of 2850 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, RX 350h Platinum 2.5L, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Polestar 3 2024 Long Range (Dual Motor) PRFM uses All Wheel Drive, while RX 350h Platinum 2.5L uses Front Wheel Drive.