Prado GXR 2.4T vs Expedition Active Touring 4X2 2025 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
190
4
6
2393 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
8
5 Doors
/
4925 mm
5636
1980 mm
2029
1935 mm
1941
2850 mm
3343
104 L
592
221 m
/
Fuel Economy
10.6 Km/L
10.3
110 L
107
10.6 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Fabric
Active-X material seats
Digital
/
3-Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Standard
/
/
24
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
Dual Stage front airbags, frontseat side impact airbags,Safety Canopy (includes thirdrow)
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
13.2
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
6
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
10-Speed Selectshift Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Rear Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
/
265/70 R18
/
265/70 R18
Key Spec
2.4 L - 2.4 L
3.5 L - 5.4 L
201 - 267 BHP
300 BHP - 440
8 Speed Automatic & 8-Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic
10-Speed Selectshift Automatic & 10-Speed SelectshifteAutomatic & Automatic
Petrol & Diesel & Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7 Seater - 7 Seater
6 Seater - 8
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.4 L
3.5
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
267 BHP
400
430 Nm
650
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Prado GXR 2.4T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Expedition Active Touring 4X2 2025
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Seats - Comfort
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Active Bonnet
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Speed Limiter
- Crash Auto Door Unlock
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious interior space
- Excellent towing ability
- Comfort and ride quality
Negative
- Fuel consumption is high
- Large size may cause difficulty in maneuvering
- The initial purchase price is high
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Prado GXR 2.4T if you care more about price; choose Expedition Active Touring 4X2 2025 if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Prado GXR 2.4T has a fuel consumption of 9.43, while Expedition Active Touring 4X2 2025 has a fuel consumption of 9.71. Therefore, Prado GXR 2.4T is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Prado GXR 2.4T has a wheelbase of 2850 mm, while Expedition Active Touring 4X2 2025 has a wheelbase of 3343. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Expedition Active Touring 4X2 2025, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Prado GXR 2.4T uses Four Wheel Drive, while Expedition Active Touring 4X2 2025 uses Rear Drive.