Prado GXR 2.4T vs Prado GXR 2.4T Comparison
Car Information
SUV
/
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
/
4
/
2393 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
/
5 Doors
/
4925 mm
/
1980 mm
/
1935 mm
/
2850 mm
/
104 L
/
221 m
/
Fuel Economy
10.6 Km/L
/
110 L
/
10.6 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
3-Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
/
Key Spec
2.4 L - 2.4 L
/
201 - 267 BHP
/
8 Speed Automatic & 8-Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic
/
Petrol & Diesel & Gasoline
/
TBD
/
7 Seater - 7 Seater
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
/
2.4 L
/
Gasoline
/
Single Turbo
/
4
/
267 BHP
/
430 Nm
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Prado GXR 2.4T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Prado GXR 2.4T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Strong performance in rough terrain
- Reliability and durability
- Spacious and comfortable interior
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High maintenance and repair costs
- Traditional interior design
Positive
- Strong performance in rough terrain
- Reliability and durability
- Spacious and comfortable interior
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High maintenance and repair costs
- Traditional interior design
Related comparisons
Editor's PickPrado GXR 2.4T
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Prado GXR 2.4T if you care more about overall equipment; choose Prado GXR 2.4T if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Prado GXR 2.4T has a fuel consumption of 9.43, while Prado GXR 2.4T has a fuel consumption of 9.43. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Prado GXR 2.4T has a wheelbase of 2850 mm, while Prado GXR 2.4T has a wheelbase of 2850 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Prado GXR 2.4T uses Four Wheel Drive, while Prado GXR 2.4T uses Four Wheel Drive.