Preface GF 2025 vs K8 2.5L GDI Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4
/
4825
5015 mm
1880
1875 mm
1469
1455 mm
2800
2895 mm
/
510 L
Fuel Economy
14
12 Km/L
/
64 L
/
12 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
6
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
12
/
HARMAN Infinity
/
Transmission
7DCT
/
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
2.5 L - 3.5 L
215 - 218
177 - 300 BHP
7DCT
8 Speed AT & Automatic & Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.0 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
215
198 BHP
/
248 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Preface GF 2025
- Power Tailgate
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
K8 2.5L GDI
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickK8 2.5L GDI
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Preface GF 2025 if you care more about fuel economy; choose K8 2.5L GDI if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Preface GF 2025 has a fuel consumption of 7.14, while K8 2.5L GDI has a fuel consumption of 8.33. Therefore, Preface GF 2025 is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Preface GF 2025 has a wheelbase of 2800, while K8 2.5L GDI has a wheelbase of 2895 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, K8 2.5L GDI, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Preface GF 2025 uses No data, while K8 2.5L GDI uses Front Wheel Drive.