Preface GL 2.0L vs Stinger 2.0T (255 PS) Comparison

Car Information

6.9

/

Engine / Motor

/

240 km/h

Dimensions

5

5 Seater

4825

4830 mm

1880

1870 mm

1469

1400 mm

2800

2905 mm

/

406 L

Fuel Economy

14.7

12.7 Km/L

/

60 L

/

12.7 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

Interior

Driver Seat

/

13.2"

/

10.2"

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

8

/

Transmission

7DCT

/

Chassis & Steering

/

Rear Wheel Drive

Key Spec

2.0 L - 2.0 L

2.0 L - 3.3 L

215 - 218

251 BHP - 365 BHP

7DCT

Automatic

Gasoline

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

Engine

2.0

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

215

251 BHP

5500

/

325

353 Nm

4500

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Preface GL 2.0L

    • Power Tailgate
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
  • Stinger 2.0T (255 PS)

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickStinger 2.0T (255 PS)

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Preface GL 2.0L if you care more about fuel economy; choose Stinger 2.0T (255 PS) if you care more about interior space.

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Preface GL 2.0L has a fuel consumption of 6.8, while Stinger 2.0T (255 PS) has a fuel consumption of 7.87. Therefore, Preface GL 2.0L is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Preface GL 2.0L has a wheelbase of 2800, while Stinger 2.0T (255 PS) has a wheelbase of 2905 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Stinger 2.0T (255 PS), offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Preface GL 2.0L uses No data, while Stinger 2.0T (255 PS) uses Rear Wheel Drive.