Q3 35 TFSI vs EREV RWD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
206 km/h
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4385 mm
4,825
2019 mm
1,980
1608 mm
1,620
2603 mm
2,940
460 L
/
Fuel Economy
15.4 Km/L
/
58 L
/
15.4 Km/L
/
Safety
✓
/
Transmission
/
Single-speed Fixed-Ratio Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
/
Key Spec
1.4 L - 2.0 L
/
150 BHP - 220 BHP
/
Automatic & Manual
/
Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
5 Seater
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
1.4 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Hybrid
150 BHP
310
250 Nm
367
/
1,152
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Q3 35 TFSI
- ABS
EREV RWD
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEREV RWD
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Q3 35 TFSI if you care more about overall equipment; choose EREV RWD if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Q3 35 TFSI has a fuel consumption of 6.49, while EREV RWD has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Q3 35 TFSI has a wheelbase of 2603 mm, while EREV RWD has a wheelbase of 2,940. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EREV RWD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Q3 35 TFSI uses Front Wheel Drive, while EREV RWD uses No data.