Q3 40 TFSI (180 HP) vs GS8 2.0T GT (4WD) Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

206 km/h

200 km/h

Dimensions

5 Seater

7 Seater

4385 mm

4980 mm

2019 mm

1950 mm

1608 mm

1780 mm

2603 mm

2920 mm

460 L

/

Fuel Economy

14.5 Km/L

12 Km/L

58 L

66 L

14.5 Km/L

12 Km/L

Comfort

/

Safety

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Four Wheel Drive

Key Spec

1.4 L - 2.0 L

2.0 L - 2.0 L

150 BHP - 220 BHP

248 BHP - 332 BHP

Automatic & Manual

8-Speed Automatic & 8AT & Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

7 - 7

Exterior

/

Engine

2.0 L

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

180 BHP

248 BHP

320 Nm

400 Nm

Technologies

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Q3 40 TFSI (180 HP)

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS
  • GS8 2.0T GT (4WD)

    • 360 Degree camera
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickGS8 2.0T GT (4WD)

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Q3 40 TFSI (180 HP) if you care more about fuel economy; choose GS8 2.0T GT (4WD) if you care more about interior space.

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Q3 40 TFSI (180 HP) has a fuel consumption of 6.9, while GS8 2.0T GT (4WD) has a fuel consumption of 8.33. Therefore, Q3 40 TFSI (180 HP) is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Q3 40 TFSI (180 HP) has a wheelbase of 2603 mm, while GS8 2.0T GT (4WD) has a wheelbase of 2920 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, GS8 2.0T GT (4WD), offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Q3 40 TFSI (180 HP) uses Front Wheel Drive, while GS8 2.0T GT (4WD) uses Four Wheel Drive.