Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD vs RX Comfort 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
206 km/h
185 km/h
4
4
1984 cc
1998 cc
GCC
Chinese
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
4485 mm
4781 mm
1856 mm
1920 mm
1585 mm
1671 mm
2680 mm
2815 mm
530 L
500 L
170 m
187 m
Fuel Economy
11 Km/L
16 Km/L
60 L
50 L
11 Km/L
16 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Smart Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
✓
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
Dual Zone
Dual Zone
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
Standard
Standard
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
9
12.3
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
6
8
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.4 L - 2.0 L
2.0 L - 2.0 L
150 BHP - 180 BHP
245 HP - 261 BHP
TBD
7DCT & 8AT & Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
2.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
Twin Turbo
4
4
180 BHP
261 BHP
320 Nm
400 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
RX Comfort 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD if you care more about overall equipment; choose RX Comfort 2.0T if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD has a fuel consumption of 9.09, while RX Comfort 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 6.25. Therefore, RX Comfort 2.0T is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD has a wheelbase of 2680 mm, while RX Comfort 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2815 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, RX Comfort 2.0T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD uses Front Wheel Drive, while RX Comfort 2.0T uses Front Wheel Drive.