Q6 e-tron vs Q7 45 TFSI S-Line Quattro (252 HP) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
233 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
/
5063 mm
/
1970 mm
/
1741 mm
/
2994 mm
/
740 L
Fuel Economy
/
12.3 Km/L
/
85 L
/
12.3 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
DHT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
/
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
279 BHP
252 BHP - 500 BHP
DHT
Automatic & CVT
Electric
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
/
5
5 Seater - 6 Seater
/
2.0 L - 6.0 L
/
TBD
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
279 BHP
252 BHP
/
2.0 L
/
370 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Q6 e-tron
Q7 45 TFSI S-Line Quattro (252 HP)
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickQ6 e-tron
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Q6 e-tron if you care more about price; choose Q7 45 TFSI S-Line Quattro (252 HP) if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Q6 e-tron has a fuel consumption of No data, while Q7 45 TFSI S-Line Quattro (252 HP) has a fuel consumption of 8.13. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Q6 e-tron has a wheelbase of No data, while Q7 45 TFSI S-Line Quattro (252 HP) has a wheelbase of 2994 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Q6 e-tron uses No data, while Q7 45 TFSI S-Line Quattro (252 HP) uses All Wheel Drive.