Q6 e-tron vs Renault Duster 2018 2.0L PE (4x2) Comparison
Car Information
SUV
/
Engine / Motor
/
173
/
4
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
/
4315
/
1822
/
1682
/
2673
/
408
Fuel Economy
/
12.2
/
50
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
DHT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
Key Spec
TBD
/
279 BHP
105 BHP - 135 BHP
DHT
Automatic & CVT & Manual
Electric
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
/
5
5 - 5
/
1.6 L - 2.0 L
/
TBD
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
279 BHP
135 BHP
/
2.0 L
/
195
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Q6 e-tron
Renault Duster 2018 2.0L PE (4x2)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Steering Adjustment
- Speed Limiter
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickRenault Duster 2018 2.0L PE (4x2)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Q6 e-tron if you care more about power; choose Renault Duster 2018 2.0L PE (4x2) if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Q6 e-tron has a fuel consumption of No data, while Renault Duster 2018 2.0L PE (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 8.2. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Q6 e-tron has a wheelbase of No data, while Renault Duster 2018 2.0L PE (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2673. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Q6 e-tron uses No data, while Renault Duster 2018 2.0L PE (4x2) uses Front Wheel Drive.