Q6 e-tron vs Renault Duster 2024 1.6L PE (4x2) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
161
/
4
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
/
4341
/
1804
/
1693
/
2676
/
414
Fuel Economy
/
17.2
/
50
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
Transmission
DHT
CVT
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
279 BHP
105 BHP - 135 BHP
DHT
Automatic & CVT & Manual
Electric
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
/
5
5 - 5
/
1.6 L - 2.0 L
/
TBD
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
279 BHP
115 BHP
/
1.6 L
/
156
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Q6 e-tron
Renault Duster 2024 1.6L PE (4x2)
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Auto Door Lock
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickQ6 e-tron
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Q6 e-tron if you care more about price; choose Renault Duster 2024 1.6L PE (4x2) if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Q6 e-tron has a fuel consumption of No data, while Renault Duster 2024 1.6L PE (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Q6 e-tron has a wheelbase of No data, while Renault Duster 2024 1.6L PE (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2676. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Q6 e-tron uses No data, while Renault Duster 2024 1.6L PE (4x2) uses Front Wheel Drive.