Qin Plus Premium vs Mage E1 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
185
190
/
4
Dimensions
Flush Door
/
5
5
1500
1480
17
19
4
/
4765
4650
1837
1905
1495
1630
2720
2775
500
/
Fuel Economy
15.6
15.8
48
51
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
8.8
10.25
LCD
/
Front Row Seats
/
Sensatec Leather
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Driver's and Passenger airbags, Front-row side airbag
4
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Front Row
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
15.6"
13.2
✓
/
✓
/
10
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Battery/Charging
6.6
/
Transmission
Automatic
AT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Drive
MacPherson
/
Torsion Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
Ventilated Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
235/55 R19
215/55 R17
235/55 R19
Key Spec
1.5 L
1.5
177 BHP - 197 BHP
202 BHP
Automatic
7AT & AT
Hybrid
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5
5
Exterior
Manual
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.5
Hybrid
Gasoline
Plug in Hybrid
/
177 BHP
202 BHP
325
305
Motor
145
/
325
/
1
/
Lithium iron phosphate battery
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Sport, Ordinary, Economical
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Qin Plus Premium
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- Blind Spot Warning
- ABS
- EBA/BA
- Child Lock
- Seat belt reminder
Mage E1
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- 360 Degree Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Qin Plus Premium if you care more about price; choose Mage E1 if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Qin Plus Premium has a fuel consumption of 6.41, while Mage E1 has a fuel consumption of 6.33. Therefore, Mage E1 is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Qin Plus Premium has a wheelbase of 2720, while Mage E1 has a wheelbase of 2775. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mage E1, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Qin Plus Premium uses Front Drive, while Mage E1 uses Front Drive.