Qin Plus Design vs Mazda 6 2021 2.5L Classic Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
185
220
/
4
Dimensions
Flush Door
/
5
5 Seater
1500
/
17
✓
4
/
4765
4.850
1837
1.840
1495
1.450
2720
2.830
500
419
Fuel Economy
15.6
12.2
48
62
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
8.8
/
LCD
/
Front Row Seats
✓
Sensatec Leather
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Driver's and Passenger airbags, Front-row side airbag
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Front Row
/
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
15.6"
/
✓
/
✓
/
10
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Battery/Charging
6.6
/
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
MacPherson
/
Torsion Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
Ventilated Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
/
Key Spec
1.5 L
2.0 L - 2.5 L
177 BHP - 197 BHP
151 BHP - 231 BHP
Automatic
6 Sp SkyActiv with Sports Mode & Automatic
Hybrid
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5
5 - 5
Exterior
Manual
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
2.5 L
Hybrid
Petrol
Plug in Hybrid
/
177 BHP
190 BHP
325
250
Motor
145
/
325
/
1
/
Lithium iron phosphate battery
/
/
N/A
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Sport, Ordinary, Economical
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Qin Plus Design
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- Blind Spot Warning
- ABS
- EBA/BA
- Child Lock
- Seat belt reminder
Mazda 6 2021 2.5L Classic
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Rear Defogger
- Keyless Entry
- Seats - Comfort
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Stylish and modern exterior design
- High internal manufacturing quality
- Great driving and control fun
Negative
- The back space may be tight
- The suspension system can be harsh on off road
- The interface of some technologies needs improvements
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Qin Plus Design if you care more about fuel economy; choose Mazda 6 2021 2.5L Classic if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Qin Plus Design has a fuel consumption of 6.41, while Mazda 6 2021 2.5L Classic has a fuel consumption of 8.2. Therefore, Qin Plus Design is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Qin Plus Design has a wheelbase of 2720, while Mazda 6 2021 2.5L Classic has a wheelbase of 2.830. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Qin Plus Design, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Qin Plus Design uses Front Drive, while Mazda 6 2021 2.5L Classic uses Front Wheel Drive.