CarteaCompare CarsQin Plus Design vs Roewe D7 Standard

Qin Plus Design vs Roewe D7 Standard Comparison

Car Information

7.3

/

18.3 kw/h

21

/

4,890 x 1,890x1,510

/

125

Engine / Motor

185

180

Dimensions

Flush Door

/

5

5

1500

/

17

17"

4

/

4765

/

1837

/

1495

/

2720

2,810

500

/

/

/

Fuel Economy

15.6

23.26 Km/L

48

55

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

8.8

/

LCD

10.25-Inch Full LCD Digital Instrument Cluster

Front Row Seats

Passenger Seat

Sensatec Leather

Leathers

/

Dual

/

/

/

/

/

Driver Seat

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

Driver's and Passenger airbags, Front-row side airbag

6

/

/

/

/

Front Row

/

/

/

Infotainment

15.6"

12.3"

10

6

/

/

Battery/Charging

6.6

/

Transmission

Automatic

AT

Chassis & Steering

Front Drive

Front Drive

MacPherson

/

Torsion Beam

/

/

MacPherson Independent / Rear Multi-link Independent

Wheels/brakes

Ventilated Disc

/

Disc

/

215/55 R17

/

215/55 R17

/

Key Spec

1.5 L

1.5L

177 BHP - 197 BHP

100 + 201

Automatic

AT

Hybrid

Hybrid

TBD

TBD

5

5

Exterior

Manual

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.5 L

1.5L

Hybrid

Hybrid

Plug in Hybrid

/

177 BHP

100 + 201

325

128

/

Motor

145

/

325

/

1

/

Lithium iron phosphate battery

Lithium Iron Phosphate

Technologies

/

/

/

Sport, Ordinary, Economical

Comfort / Standard/Sport

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Qin Plus Design

    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Number of Airbags
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • ABS
    • EBA/BA
    • Child Lock
    • Seat belt reminder
  • Roewe D7 Standard

    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Keyless Entry
    • Number of Airbags
    • Intelligent Emergency Call
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickQin Plus Design

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Qin Plus Design if you care more about price; choose Roewe D7 Standard if you care more about fuel economy.

Popular Car Comparisons

BYD | Qin Plus Design

VS

Hyundai | Hyundai Elantra 2022 1.6L Comfort

BYD | Qin Plus Design

VS

Nissan | SUNNY SV Plus

BYD | Qin Plus Design

VS

Toyota | Corolla 1.6L XLI

BYD | Qin Plus Design

VS

Toyota | Yaris Sedan G

BYD | Qin Plus Design

VS

Toyota | Toyota Corolla 2024 1.6L XLI

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Qin Plus Design has a fuel consumption of 6.41, while Roewe D7 Standard has a fuel consumption of 4.3. Therefore, Roewe D7 Standard is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Qin Plus Design has a wheelbase of 2720, while Roewe D7 Standard has a wheelbase of 2,810. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Roewe D7 Standard, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Qin Plus Design uses Front Drive, while Roewe D7 Standard uses Front Drive.