QX50 Luxe Style AWD vs Skoda Kodiaq 2023 2.0 TSI Style (AWD) Comparison

Car Information

6.3

8.2

Engine / Motor

230

207

4

4

Dimensions

5 Seater

7 Seater

4693

4697

1903

1882

1679

1681

2800

2791

895

650

Fuel Economy

11.1

13.5

60

60

Comfort

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

CVT

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

2.0 L - 3.7 L

2.0 L

268 BHP - 326 BHP

180 BHP

Automatic & CVT

Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

7 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

268 BHP

180 BHP

380

320

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • QX50 Luxe Style AWD

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Rear Defogger
    • Push Button Start
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
    • Crash Auto Door Unlock
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking
  • Skoda Kodiaq 2023 2.0 TSI Style (AWD)

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Push Button Start
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickSkoda Kodiaq 2023 2.0 TSI Style (AWD)

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose QX50 Luxe Style AWD if you care more about interior space; choose Skoda Kodiaq 2023 2.0 TSI Style (AWD) if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Infiniti | QX50 Luxe Style AWD

VS

Nissan | Nissan Patrol 2021 4.0L SE Titanium

Infiniti | QX50 Luxe Style AWD

VS

Jaguar | Jaguar F-Pace 2023 2.0T S (250 PS)

Infiniti | QX50 Luxe Style AWD

VS

Jaguar | Jaguar F-Pace 2024 2.0T S (250 PS)

Infiniti | QX50 Luxe Style AWD

VS

Jaguar | Jaguar F Pace 2024 2.0T S (250 PS)

Infiniti | QX50 Luxe Style AWD

VS

Jaguar | Jaguar F Pace 2023 2.0T S (250 PS)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, QX50 Luxe Style AWD has a fuel consumption of 9.01, while Skoda Kodiaq 2023 2.0 TSI Style (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 7.41. Therefore, Skoda Kodiaq 2023 2.0 TSI Style (AWD) is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, QX50 Luxe Style AWD has a wheelbase of 2800, while Skoda Kodiaq 2023 2.0 TSI Style (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2791. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, QX50 Luxe Style AWD, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. QX50 Luxe Style AWD uses All Wheel Drive, while Skoda Kodiaq 2023 2.0 TSI Style (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.