QX50 Luxe Style AWD vs Tiggo7 Pro Max COM Comparison

Car Information

6.3

/

Engine / Motor

230

/

4

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5

4693

4500

1903

1842

1679

1746

2800

2670

895

/

/

Flush Door

/

18

/

5

Fuel Economy

11.1

16.6

60

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Manual

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

Driver Seat

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Driver Seat

/

12.3

/

Driver Seat

/

Driver Seat

/

Driver Seat

/

/

Dual

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

12.3

/

/

6

Transmission

CVT

7DCT

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Front Drive

Key Spec

2.0 L - 3.7 L

1.5 L - 1.6 L

268 BHP - 326 BHP

154 - 197 BHP

Automatic & CVT

6DCT AT & 7-speed Dual-Clutch Transmission (DCT) & 7DCT

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

1.6 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

268 BHP

197 BHP

380

290

/

1.6L TDGI

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • QX50 Luxe Style AWD

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Rear Defogger
    • Push Button Start
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
    • Crash Auto Door Unlock
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking
  • Tiggo7 Pro Max COM

    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Push Button Start
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Steering Adjustment

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickTiggo7 Pro Max COM

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose QX50 Luxe Style AWD if you care more about interior space; choose Tiggo7 Pro Max COM if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Infiniti | QX50 Luxe Style AWD

VS

Jeep | Gladiator Sport 3.6L

Infiniti | QX50 Luxe Style AWD

VS

Jeep | Jeep Gladiator 2024 3.6L Sport (4x4)

Infiniti | QX50 Luxe Style AWD

VS

Jeep | Jeep Gladiator 2021 3.6L Overland (4x4)

Infiniti | QX50 Luxe Style AWD

VS

Tank | Tank 500 Prestige 2.0T

Infiniti | QX50 Luxe Style AWD

VS

Lincoln | Lincoln Nautilus 2021 2.0T (250 Hp)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, QX50 Luxe Style AWD has a fuel consumption of 9.01, while Tiggo7 Pro Max COM has a fuel consumption of 6.02. Therefore, Tiggo7 Pro Max COM is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, QX50 Luxe Style AWD has a wheelbase of 2800, while Tiggo7 Pro Max COM has a wheelbase of 2670. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, QX50 Luxe Style AWD, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. QX50 Luxe Style AWD uses All Wheel Drive, while Tiggo7 Pro Max COM uses Front Drive.