QX50 Sport vs CRV DX (2WD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
230
200 km/h
4
4
/
1490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4693
4706 mm
1903
1866 mm
1679
1681 mm
2800
2700 mm
895
375 L
/
5 Doors
Fuel Economy
11.1
11 Km/L
60
58 L
/
11 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
✓
/
CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.7 L
1.5 L - 2.4 L
268 BHP - 326 BHP
184 BHP - 190
Automatic & CVT
Automatic & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater - 7
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
268 BHP
190 BHP
380
243 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
QX50 Sport
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Runflat Tyres
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Active Bonnet
- Collision Detection
- Crash Auto Door Unlock
- Auto Door Lock
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
CRV DX (2WD)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- High reliability and durable performance
- A wide range of security technologies
- Excellent fuel efficiency
Negative
- The price is higher than some competitors
- Lack of hybrid drive options in some markets
- Limited charging capacity compared to some competitors
Related comparisons
Editor's PickCRV DX (2WD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose QX50 Sport if you care more about fuel economy; choose CRV DX (2WD) if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, QX50 Sport has a fuel consumption of 9.01, while CRV DX (2WD) has a fuel consumption of 9.09. Therefore, QX50 Sport is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, QX50 Sport has a wheelbase of 2800, while CRV DX (2WD) has a wheelbase of 2700 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, QX50 Sport, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. QX50 Sport uses All Wheel Drive, while CRV DX (2WD) uses Front Wheel Drive.