QX50 Sport vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
230
161 km/h
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4693
4341 mm
1903
1804 mm
1679
1693 mm
2800
2676 mm
895
414 L
Fuel Economy
11.1
17.2 Km/L
60
50 L
/
17.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
✓
/
CVT
/
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.7 L
1.6 L - 2.0 L
268 BHP - 326 BHP
105 BHP - 135 BHP
Automatic & CVT
Automatic & CVT & Manual
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.0 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
268 BHP
115 BHP
380
156 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
QX50 Sport
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Runflat Tyres
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Active Bonnet
- Collision Detection
- Crash Auto Door Unlock
- Auto Door Lock
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Duster 1.6L PE (4x2)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDuster 1.6L PE (4x2)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose QX50 Sport if you care more about interior space; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, QX50 Sport has a fuel consumption of 9.01, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, QX50 Sport has a wheelbase of 2800, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, QX50 Sport, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. QX50 Sport uses All Wheel Drive, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) uses Front Wheel Drive.