QX50 Sport vs EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters Comparison

Car Information

6.3

6.5

/

160+160

/

≥400

Engine / Motor

230

/

4

N/A, Electric

Dimensions

5 Seater

7 Seater

4693

5209

1903

2010

1679

1731

2800

3110

895

/

Fuel Economy

11.1

/

60

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

/

CVT

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

/

All Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

/

Key Spec

2.0 L - 3.7 L

/

268 BHP - 326 BHP

429 BHP - 543 BHP

Automatic & CVT

Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Electric

TBD

/

5 Seater

4 Seater - 7 Seater

/

TBD

/

320 km - 515 km

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

0.0 L

Gasoline

Electric

268 BHP

429 BHP

380

600

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • QX50 Sport

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Rear Defogger
    • Push Button Start
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Runflat Tyres
    • Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Active Bonnet
    • Collision Detection
    • Crash Auto Door Unlock
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking
  • EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Door Edge Protector
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Lane Departure Warning

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickQX50 Sport

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose QX50 Sport if you care more about price; choose EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Infiniti | QX50 Sport

VS

Hongqi | Hongqi HS7 2021 3.0T Comfortable (AWD)

Infiniti | QX50 Sport

VS

Jaguar | Jaguar F Pace 2020 2.0T Prestige LE (250 PS)

Infiniti | QX50 Sport

VS

Toyota | Prado GXL 2.4T

Infiniti | QX50 Sport

VS

Toyota | Toyota Land Cruiser 2022 4.0L EXR

Infiniti | QX50 Sport

VS

Nissan | Nissan Patrol 2022 4.0L SE T2

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, QX50 Sport has a fuel consumption of 9.01, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, QX50 Sport has a wheelbase of 2800, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters has a wheelbase of 3110. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. QX50 Sport uses All Wheel Drive, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters uses All Wheel Drive.