QX50 Sport vs SQ6 e-tron Comparison

Car Information

6.3

/

/

598 km

/

800V

Engine / Motor

230

/

4

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5

4693

/

1903

/

1679

/

2800

/

895

514

/

64

Fuel Economy

11.1

/

60

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

11.9

/

Dinamica Microfibre

/

/

Sport Seats Plus

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

14.5

Battery/Charging

/

270

/

11

/

10 min

Transmission

/

CVT

DHT

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Four-Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

/

/

Key Spec

2.0 L - 3.7 L

/

268 BHP - 326 BHP

TBD

Automatic & CVT

DHT

Gasoline & Petrol

Electric

TBD

/

5 Seater

5

/

TBD

/

TBD

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

/

Gasoline

Electric

268 BHP

/

380

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Motor

/

Lithium-ion

/

489

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • QX50 Sport

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Rear Defogger
    • Push Button Start
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Runflat Tyres
    • Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Active Bonnet
    • Collision Detection
    • Crash Auto Door Unlock
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking
  • SQ6 e-tron

    • 360 Degree Camera

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickSQ6 e-tron

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose QX50 Sport if you care more about overall equipment; choose SQ6 e-tron if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Infiniti | QX50 Sport

VS

Honda | Honda Pilot 2024 3.5 Touring (AWD)

Infiniti | QX50 Sport

VS

Chevrolet | Chevrolet Suburban 2018 5.3L LT Z71

Infiniti | QX50 Sport

VS

Toyota | Toyota Land Cruiser 2019 4.6L EXR

Infiniti | QX50 Sport

VS

Toyota | Toyota Land Cruiser 2018 4.6L EXR

Infiniti | QX50 Sport

VS

Audi | Audi Q5 2019 45 TFSI quattro

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, QX50 Sport has a fuel consumption of 9.01, while SQ6 e-tron has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, QX50 Sport has a wheelbase of 2800, while SQ6 e-tron has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. QX50 Sport uses All Wheel Drive, while SQ6 e-tron uses Four-Wheel Drive.