QX50 Sport vs T2 i-DM Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
230
200
4
4
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4693
4785
1903
2006
1679
1875
2800
2800
895
752
/
5
/
220
Fuel Economy
11.1
18.5
60
70 L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
15.6
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
12
Transmission
✓
/
CVT
DHT
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
All Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.7 L
1.5
268 BHP - 326 BHP
154 BHP - 600
Automatic & CVT
3DHT & DHT
Gasoline & Petrol
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
1.5
Gasoline
Hybrid
268 BHP
154 BHP
380
220
/
In-Line
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
QX50 Sport
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Runflat Tyres
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Active Bonnet
- Collision Detection
- Crash Auto Door Unlock
- Auto Door Lock
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
T2 i-DM
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Attractive and modern exterior design
- High fuel efficiency
- Efficient hybrid propulsion system
Negative
- Luggage compartment space is limited
- Lack of digital entertainment options
- Traction ability is not the best in its class
Related comparisons
Editor's PickT2 i-DM
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose QX50 Sport if you care more about power; choose T2 i-DM if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, QX50 Sport has a fuel consumption of 9.01, while T2 i-DM has a fuel consumption of 5.41. Therefore, T2 i-DM is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, QX50 Sport has a wheelbase of 2800, while T2 i-DM has a wheelbase of 2800. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. QX50 Sport uses All Wheel Drive, while T2 i-DM uses Four Wheel Drive.