QX60 Autograph vs Durango 3.6L GT(RWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
197 km/h
Dimensions
7
7 Seater
5033
5110 mm
1981
1925 mm
1770
1847 mm
2900
3043 mm
170
/
/
487 L
Fuel Economy
8.7
9.1 Km/L
/
93 L
/
9.1 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front and Back Row Seats
/
Triple
/
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
AT
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.5 L - 3.5 L
3.6 L - 6.4 L
265 BHP - 295 BHP
290 BHP - 475 BHP
AT & Automatic & CVT
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
6 Seater - 7
7 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
3.5
3.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
279
295 BHP
350
353 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
QX60 Autograph
Durango 3.6L GT(RWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDurango 3.6L GT(RWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose QX60 Autograph if you care more about overall equipment; choose Durango 3.6L GT(RWD) if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, QX60 Autograph has a fuel consumption of 11.49, while Durango 3.6L GT(RWD) has a fuel consumption of 10.99. Therefore, Durango 3.6L GT(RWD) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, QX60 Autograph has a wheelbase of 2900, while Durango 3.6L GT(RWD) has a wheelbase of 3043 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Durango 3.6L GT(RWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. QX60 Autograph uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Durango 3.6L GT(RWD) uses Rear Wheel Drive.