QX60 Autograph vs Tiggo 9 Comfort Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
7
7
5033
4810
1981
1925
1770
1742
2900
2800
170
/
/
19
Fuel Economy
8.7
13
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front and Back Row Seats
Driver Seat
Triple
Triple
✓
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
10.25
/
✓
/
10.25"
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
6
/
✓
Infotainment
/
15.6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
Battery/Charging
/
4
Transmission
AT
AT
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Drive
Key Spec
3.5 L - 3.5 L
-
265 BHP - 295 BHP
254 - 254
AT & Automatic & CVT
AT & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
6 Seater - 7
7
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.5
2.0L
Gasoline
Gasoline
279
254
350
390
/
Turbocharge
/
2.0T GDI
Technologies
✓
✓
/
19 ADAS Functions
/
✓
/
✓
/
Eco + Normal + Sport
Comparison of configuration highlights
QX60 Autograph
Tiggo 9 Comfort
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Number of Airbags
- Blind Spot Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickTiggo 9 Comfort
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose QX60 Autograph if you care more about interior space; choose Tiggo 9 Comfort if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, QX60 Autograph has a fuel consumption of 11.49, while Tiggo 9 Comfort has a fuel consumption of 7.69. Therefore, Tiggo 9 Comfort is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, QX60 Autograph has a wheelbase of 2900, while Tiggo 9 Comfort has a wheelbase of 2800. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, QX60 Autograph, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. QX60 Autograph uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Tiggo 9 Comfort uses Front Drive.