QX60 Autograph vs Tahoe RST Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
180 km/h
Dimensions
7
7 Seater
5033
5181
1981
2053
1770
1925
2900
3071
170
/
/
22
/
5 Doors
/
3479
Fuel Economy
8.7
9.7
/
100
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
Interior
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front and Back Row Seats
/
Triple
✓
✓
/
/
10.2
/
Jet Black/Victory Red perforated leather seating
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
frontal airbags for driver and front outboard passenger; seat-mounted side-impact airbags for driver and front outboard passenger; driver inboard seat-mounted side-impact airbag; headcurtain airbags for all rows in outboard seating positions3,4
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
9
/
BOSE
Transmission
AT
10AT
/
Electronic Limited Slip Differential (Active Reponse 4WD)
/
AT
/
10
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
/
✓
/
Electronic Limited Slip Differential (Active Reponse 4WD)
Key Spec
3.5 L - 3.5 L
5.3 L - 6.2 L
265 BHP - 295 BHP
320 BHP - 420 BHP
AT & Automatic & CVT
10 Speed AT & 10AT & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Petrol & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
6 Seater - 7
7 Seater - 9 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.5
6.2 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
279
420 BHP
350
624
Technologies
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
QX60 Autograph
Tahoe RST
- 360 Degree Camera
- Cool Box
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Rollover stability control
- Collision Detection
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose QX60 Autograph if you care more about price; choose Tahoe RST if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, QX60 Autograph has a fuel consumption of 11.49, while Tahoe RST has a fuel consumption of 10.31. Therefore, Tahoe RST is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, QX60 Autograph has a wheelbase of 2900, while Tahoe RST has a wheelbase of 3071. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Tahoe RST, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. QX60 Autograph uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Tahoe RST uses Four-Wheel Drive.