QX60 Autograph vs Ti 3 RWD Pro Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
7
5
5033
4605
1981
1900
1770
1720
2900
/
170
/
Fuel Economy
8.7
/
Interior
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front and Back Row Seats
/
Triple
/
✓
/
Transmission
AT
DHT
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Rear Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
235/60 R18
/
235/60 R18
Key Spec
3498 L - 3498 L
/
279 - 279
218 BHP - 422 BHP
AT & Automatic
DHT
Gasoline & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
6 Seater - 7
5
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
3.5
/
Gasoline
Electric
279
218 BHP
350
/
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
QX60 Autograph
Ti 3 RWD Pro
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickTi 3 RWD Pro
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose QX60 Autograph if you care more about power; choose Ti 3 RWD Pro if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, QX60 Autograph has a fuel consumption of 11.49, while Ti 3 RWD Pro has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, QX60 Autograph has a wheelbase of 2900, while Ti 3 RWD Pro has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. QX60 Autograph uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Ti 3 RWD Pro uses Rear Drive.