QX60 Autograph vs Tiggo 4 Pro COM Comparison

Car Information

Dimensions

7

5

5033

4318

1981

1831

1770

1662

2900

2610

170

/

/

Flush Door

/

17

/

5

Fuel Economy

8.7

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

Manual

Interior

/

Front Row Seats

/

Front and Back Row Seats

/

Triple

/

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

Cloth

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

Dual Front Airbags

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

10.25

/

/

/

/

4

Transmission

AT

CVT

Chassis & Steering

Four-Wheel Drive

Front Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

215/60 R17

/

215/60 R17

Key Spec

3.5 L - 3.5 L

1.5 L - 1.5 L

265 BHP - 295 BHP

113 BHP - 156

AT & Automatic & CVT

Automatic & CVT

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

6 Seater - 7

5 - 5

Exterior

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

3.5

1.5 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

279

111 BHP

350

/

/

1.5L

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

ECO, Normal

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • QX60 Autograph

    • Tiggo 4 Pro COM

      • Push Button Start
      • Keyless Entry
      • Parking sensor rear
      • Keyless Start
      • Steering Adjustment
      • Anti-Theft Alarm System
      • Number of Airbags
      • ABS
      • EBD/CBC
      • EBA/BA

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickTiggo 4 Pro COM

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose QX60 Autograph if you care more about interior space; choose Tiggo 4 Pro COM if you care more about overall equipment.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Infiniti | QX60 Autograph

    VS

    Audi | Audi Q5 2024 45 TFSI S-Line Quattro

    Infiniti | QX60 Autograph

    VS

    Genesis | Genesis GV80 2021 2.5T Prestige

    Infiniti | QX60 Autograph

    VS

    BMW | BMW X4 2022 xDrive 30i

    Infiniti | QX60 Autograph

    VS

    BMW | BMW X4 2021 xDrive 30i

    Infiniti | QX60 Autograph

    VS

    BMW | BMW X4 2020 xDrive 30i

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, QX60 Autograph has a fuel consumption of 11.49, while Tiggo 4 Pro COM has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, QX60 Autograph has a wheelbase of 2900, while Tiggo 4 Pro COM has a wheelbase of 2610. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, QX60 Autograph, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. QX60 Autograph uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Tiggo 4 Pro COM uses Front Drive.