QX60 Sensory vs AITO 7 - 6 seater Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
7
6
5033
5020
1981
1945
1770
1760
2900
2820
170
/
/
21"
Fuel Economy
8.7
/
/
60
Comfort
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Front Row Seats
Front Row Seats
Front and Back Row Seats
Front Row Seats
Triple
/
✓
✓
/
Front & Back Row Seats
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
15.6
/
✓
/
✓
/
19
Transmission
AT
single-speed AT transmission
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.5 L - 3.5 L
1.5L
265 BHP - 295 BHP
449 hp
AT & Automatic & CVT
single-speed AT transmission
Gasoline & Petrol
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
6 Seater - 7
6
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.5
1.5L
Gasoline
Hybrid
279
449 hp
350
660Front：300/Rear：360
/
Turbocharge
/
330Front：130/Rear：200
Technologies
✓
✓
/
192 Laser LiDRA + 3 Millimeter-wave radar
/
12 Ultrasonic radar + 7 High perception camera + 4 Surround view camera
/
✓
Motor
/
330Front：130/Rear：200
Comparison of configuration highlights
QX60 Sensory
AITO 7 - 6 seater
- Welcome Light
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose QX60 Sensory if you care more about interior space; choose AITO 7 - 6 seater if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, QX60 Sensory has a fuel consumption of 11.49, while AITO 7 - 6 seater has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, QX60 Sensory has a wheelbase of 2900, while AITO 7 - 6 seater has a wheelbase of 2820. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, QX60 Sensory, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. QX60 Sensory uses Four-Wheel Drive, while AITO 7 - 6 seater uses Four-Wheel Drive.